We received a submission for this dilemma from PMP member William Burns, who correctly identified that the limit of this sequence is one, not an irrational number. So although a single infinite continued fraction must represent an irrational number, a sequence of ever-longer finite continued fractions can tend to a rational number.
Here’s why . Notice that the leading term of is , which is always equal to one. So for , is one plus something, and that something is always positive. And the second term of is or just so the quantity that we are adding to that initial one is a fraction with numerator 1 and denominator , possibly plus something positive. In any case, the quantity added is less than In other words, we have shown that for , (we have in the denominator here as and differ by one because of the definition of the sequence ) But as , So by the Squeeze Theorem for sequences, we must also have that ■