D. S_D13

Contributed by Eagle Problem Solvers, Blazej Kot, Andrew Trentacoste II, and Christopher West, Georgia Southern University, PMP, PMP, and PMP

The Prisoner’s Dilemma received submissions from three PMP participants: a full one from Christopher West, a nearly complete solution from Blazej Kot, and one from Andrew Trentacoste II. The Eagle Problem Solvers of Georgia Southern University also submitted a very thorough solution.

Every complete solution received relied on methods of calculus, so we follow such an approach here. Raising both sides of the equation defining the experbola to the 1 / x y power, we see that it is also the curve satisfying x 1 / x = y 1 / y . So determining points on the experbola (and properties of the curve as asked about here) becomes entirely about finding distinct values of t for which the function E ( t ) = t 1 / t (shown in Figure 6) takes on the same value. In other words, we want to find horizontal lines which intersect the graph of E twice. Now, if t > 1 , then 1 / t > 0 , and so E ( t ) = t 1 / t > 1 . Therefore, any such horizontal line must satisfy E > 1 . Relating this observation back to the experbola, all points on it must satisfy x > 1 and y > 1 . Moreover, it appears from the graph in Figure 6 that E is strictly increasing up to some value of x , and strictly decreasing thereafter. Presuming so, it means that any horizontal line can intersect the graph of E at most twice, once to the left of that maximum value, and once to its right.

Figure 6: The function E ( t ) = t 1 / t .

We verify this property by considering the first derivative

E ′ ( t ) = t − 2 + 1 / t ( 1 − ln ⁡ t ) .


Since t − 2 + 1 / t is always positive, this derivative is positive (i.e., E is increasing) when 1 − ln ⁡ t > 0 , or in other words, for t < e . Similarly, E is strictly decreasing for t > e , and has a unique maximum at t = e . Translating these facts back to the experbola, if ( x , y ) is any point on the experbola, one of x or y is less than e and the other is larger.

So for question (a), we already know that in any integer solution, both x and y must be larger than one, and one or the other must be less than e , or in other words, equal to 2. Thus the only integer solutions are x = 2 , y = 4 and x = 4 , y = 2 .


As the original proposer William Keehn points out, it is easiest to next consider part (d): one can verify by direct computation that for all t > 1 ,

( t 1 / ( t − 1 ) , t t / ( t − 1 ) )

lies on the experbola. So the desired functions are f ( t ) = t 1 / ( t − 1 ) and g ( t ) = t t / ( t − 1 ) .


Turning back to question (b), we want to find asymptotes of the experbola, so we let t tend to infinity in f ( t ) and g ( t ) . It is easier to work with F ( t ) = ln ⁡ f ( t ) = ( ln ⁡ t ) / ( t − 1 ) and G ( t ) = ln ⁡ g ( t ) = t ( ln ⁡ t ) / ( t − 1 ) . Using L’Hôpital’s rule, the limits of F and G as t goes to infinity are the limits of 1 / t and ln ⁡ t + 1 , respectively. So F tends to 0 and G to infinity, or in other words, x = f ( x ) = e F ( t ) tends to 1 and y = g ( x ) = e G ( t ) tends to infinity. Thus, the experbola has a vertical asymptote at x = 1 , and by symmetry, a horizontal asymptote at y = 1.

Finally, we can find the point that should be added to restore the continuity of the experbola by taking the limit in the parametrization of the experbola as t goes to 1. Using L’Hôpital’s rule again in exactly the same way, we see that both and F and G approach 1 as t tends to 1, which in turn means that f and g approach e , so the “missing” point is ( e , e ) .

This problem originally appeared in the Prisoner’s Dilemma in the issue of the PMP Newsletter. Solutions will be accepted through .